Which of the following is NOT a valid reason for rejecting an insurance claim?

The determination that the claimant lists damages that exceed the limits of their insurance policy is considered a valid reason for rejecting an insurance claim. When a claim exceeds the coverage limits stipulated in the insurance policy, it indicates that the insurer is not contractually obligated to pay beyond those limits, making it a legitimate basis for denial.

In contrast, the other options present situations where the rejection of a claim is justified. If the claimant lacks applicable insurance coverage, the insurer cannot assume any liability, as there is no policy to cover the event in question. Similarly, if a claim is fraudulent, it undermines the trust required in the insurance relationship, giving grounds for rejection. Lastly, when a claimant fails to provide proof of damages, there is insufficient evidence to support the validity of the claim, which also constitutes a justifiable reason for denial.

Therefore, the rationale behind the correct answer being that the claimant lists damages exceeding policy limits stems from the fundamental principles of insurance coverage and contractual obligations between the insurer and the insured.